| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
- Citirx (47)
- event (1)
- General Virtualization (18)
- Green Computing (4)
- Microsoft (5)
- Pandemic (1)
- Products (5)
- Uncategorized (26)
- VDI (68)
- VMware (19)
- XenApp (4)
- Xendesktop (10)
- XENserver (9)
- 13. January 2012: Top 10 Free Citrix support Tools
- 11. January 2012: New VDI interface for Ipad from Citrix
- 10. November 2011: Citrix Acquires ShareFile, The “Dropbox For Enterprises”
- 4. November 2011: VDI Optimizer
- 5. October 2011: Some Old School Citrix tools:
- 7. April 2011: Remember that VDI project that performed well in the lab, but once out in the enterprise, its performance left something to be desired?
- 11. February 2011: The future of Virtual desktops
- 1. February 2011: Terminal Services versus VDI: Brian's presentation from VMworld Europe
- 28. January 2011: Virtual desktops: The Future is Now
- 27. January 2011: Connecting to VM Pool using Windows Server 2008 R2 VDI infrastructure
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Client hypervisors, are they the missing VDI link?
Citrix recently announced XenClient, their client side bare metal hypervisor. VMware announced their client hypervisor back in February and I would not be surprised if Microsoft was also developing a product. A bare metal (or type 1) hypervisor is a visualization layer which is installed directly on your hardware. Most of us are familar with server visualization, well client hypervisors are simply applying the same technology to desktops and laptops. A client hypervisor is more challenging to develop though due to the much broader hardware support needed: think graphics, audio, USB, firewire etc.
So what’s the point? Why the race to bring out a client hypervisor? Because the client hypervisor could be the missing piece of the VDI puzzle. Today, if you implement a VDI solution what do you do with your mobile users or power users who need more resources than VDI can provide? Nothing, you leave them running a locally installed OS which is a different image (or possibly several images to accommodation hardware flavours) to the VDI users. This means greater management effort and costs as well as more difficult and complex troubleshooting.
In the client hypervisor world everyone in your organisation can run the same OS image whether connected to a server based VDI instance or on a physical laptop or desktop. This will drastically simplify environments with follow on cost savings.
Bring it on I say! I can’t wait to try out a client hypervisor.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.